"The happiest place on earth"

Get email updates of new posts:        (Delivered by FeedBurner)

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Links - 24th April 2024 (2)

Alabama IVF ruling: What does it mean for fertility patients? - "A ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court that frozen embryos are considered children, and that a person could be held liable for accidentally destroying them, has opened up a new front in the US battle over reproductive medicine.  The decision has thrown the future of IVF treatments in the state into doubt, with a host of healthcare providers in the state suspending the service."

'Such a good heart': Dessert stall in Bukit Merah gives out free food for Muslims to break fast, earning praise - "TikTok user Shallummaswandi, who goes by Shallum, shared a clip of him visiting Jin Jin Dessert stall at ABC Brickworks Market & Food Centre and having a chat with a staff member there.  In an unplanned interview with one of the dessert stall's bosses, Shallum learned that Jin Jin Dessert has been actively giving out free food to the Muslim community during the month of Ramadan.  And apparently, it's a tradition that has been going on for a few years. Jin Jin Dessert's boss, who wasn't named in the clip, shared that the stall has been providing free desserts to mosques around the area "for the past five to six years".  During Ramadan, 100 packets of desserts will be prepared every Friday for Muslims to break their fast.  On Saturdays, at about 5pm, Jin Jin Dessert will set aside desserts by the side of the stall for Muslim patrons to pick up at no charge.  "For any Muslims, feel free to take," he added."
What would happen if someone gave free fish to Christians on Fridays, or during Lent?

Thousands of older drivers opt for restrictions on how far they can drive rather than do on-road driving test - "Thousands of elderly people in NSW are dodging on-road driving tests by opting for a modified licence that restricts the distances they can drive.   In NSW, drivers must undergo annual medical tests once they turn 75 to maintain their licence.  Once they turn 85, they must also complete a practical driving test every two years.  But older drivers can skip the on-road assessment if they volunteer for a conditional licence, which limits how far they can drive and may stop them driving at night. Judy Kelly, 87, took up this option, labelling the requirement for an on-road assessment "ageist"."

Meme - "Sunday supermarket shopping in Europe
Green: Open
Red: Closed  Norway, Germany, Poland, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, most of Spain, Greece, Slovenia, Montenegro*
Blue: Open 6 hours *France, England, Northern Ireland*

Meme - Frodo Baggins: "Bilbos' gone? this is the worst day of my life"
Gandalf: "the worst day of your life so far. Pick up that ring."

Everyday Aggression Takes Many Forms - "Aggression can take a variety of forms; people hurt one another in a variety of ways. This article summarizes a research program that has examined several questions regarding how people harm one another in their day-to-day lives. The evidence shows that (a) the people that we interact with most frequently (e.g., family members, friends, romantic partners) are the most likely to make us angry; (b) we can hurt people by direct (e.g., physical or verbal attack) or nondirect action (e.g., spreading rumors, giving someone the silent treatment); and (c) the way we hurt people depends on our relationship with them. Whether the harm takes the form of words or blows, aggression is harmful to individuals and to relationships."

Puberty makes teenagers’ armpits smell of cheese, goat and urine, say scientists - "Puberty makes teenagers’ armpits smell of cheese, goat and even urine, scientists in Germany have discovered.  The particular chemical compounds that make up pubescent body odour have been singled out, should anyone want to bottle “eau du teenager”.  More usefully, the discovery could help the creation of deodorants that mask those particular smells. It has also explained why babies smell better. The study compared infants under three years old with 14- to 18-year-olds and found teenagers had two particular chemical compounds that smell of sweat, urine, musk and sandalwood, which were not present in babies. Infants, on the other hand, had higher levels of a ketone that smells flowery and soapy... The pads from the teenagers’ armpits had two steroids present – 5alphaandrost-16-en-3-one and 5alphaandrost-16-en-3alpha-ol – which smell of sweat, urine, musk and sandalwood. They also had higher levels of six carboxylic acids, which give off unattractive smells including cheese, goat and wax.  Babies’ samples showed higher levels of the ketone alpha-isomethyl ionone, which smells of flowers and soap, with a hint of violet... Researchers at Erlangen-Nürnberg’s Aroma and Smell Research Facility said changing body odour in development was known to affect the interaction between parents and children. “Body odours of infants are pleasant and rewarding to mothers and, as such, probably facilitate parental affection,” they wrote.  “In contrast, body odours of pubertal children are rated as less pleasant and parents are unable to identify their own child during this developmental stage.”"

Quiet quitting is just Gen Z's new name for an old work concept | Fortune - "Quiet quitting is just a new term for an old concept that every generation discovers anew: doing the bare minimum at work. The caption to @thelizjane’s video says it all: “Quiet quitting isn’t just a Gen Z thing or a new phenomenon—people have worked like this for years.” (Or not worked like this for years, critics would say.)...   You might know quiet quitting by another term: disengagement, Stephan Meier, professor of business at Columbia Business School and Chair of Management Division, tells Fortune.   He points to the statistics: More than 67% of U.S. employees and more than 86% of employees worldwide report not being engaged in their jobs over the past 15 years. “It’s possible that this has increased somewhat after the pandemic, but it is not a new phenomenon,” he says."

Meme - Dasha & Varg Do America: "I have a soft spot for the last logos movie studios used before they all converted to CGl. *Universal. WB. Paramount. 20th Century Fox*"

How Can I Dress to Not Look Like a Tourist in France? - The New York Times - "Once upon a time it was easy to spot Americans abroad (or so the cliché went, anyway): They were the loud ones in jeans and T-shirts with fanny packs and baseball caps.  Now, of course, everything once out is in again, and, as is its wont, fashion has embraced all of the above. The erstwhile gauche is now global and can even be chic, depending on your appetite for irony. That does not mean, however, that there aren’t certain … national stereotypes that still apply.  Since I have spent the last week at the couture shows in Paris, I took the liberty of asking some locals what pieces scream “American” to them. The answer, almost always: leggings. Or, for that matter, other sorts of workout wear worn as daywear: sports bras, bike shorts and the like. There is no word for “athleisure” in French. Honestly, that term shouldn’t even exist in English. It is the new fanny pack.  Also, on the other extreme, anything too “Emily in Paris.” (French people have a lot of feelings about “Emily in Paris.”)  Translation: anything that is too colorful (it’s the clothing equivalent of loud), complicated and appears to be trying too hard. Including hairdos that are overly blow-dried, obvious makeup and stilettos. Instead, think neutrals: black, white, beige, navy, olive green. Which, in any case, can be mixed and matched at will and are thus good for packing. Think understatement; think the marketing executive played by Philippine Leroy-Beaulieu in “Emily” rather than Emily herself. Think sneakers, but in classic white, not in wildly clashing neon. Denim, as long as it is worn almost as if it has been tailored. Also a trench coat, a shirtdress, a white shirt, a black blazer. And think the single strategically chosen accessory: a scarf, a wide belt, some big earrings, though worn one at a time. Ditto logos. They are OK, but not in multiples.  As Inès de la Fressange, a woman who is so quintessentially French that she became the model for Marianne, the face of the nation, once said: “In France, women put on less things. If they have a necklace, they don’t put on earrings. If they have nail polish, they don’t put on all their rings and all their bracelets.” (As it happens, she has a line with Uniqlo, so if you want to see what she means, you can find it for yourself.) The point is: There’s nothing basic about basics when you’re traveling; they are now universal. It’s the basics you choose that give away your point of origin."

Marcus du Sautoy: Escape by numbers - "Several of the Lebanese hostages incarcerated for years in the 1980s described how exploring numbers in their heads helped relieve days of isolation. Prison wardens can deprive inmates of hard-earned TVs and games consoles if prison rules are breached. But even the harshest regimes can't strip you of the tools necessary for digging a tunnel out to the mathematical world... Mathematical history is peppered with examples of stunning breakthroughs (rather than breakouts) made by prisoners. In 1831, Evariste Galois, a 19-year-old French revolutionary, was imprisoned for wearing a banned military uniform and threatening the life of the king, Louis-Philippe. Although his actions failed to incite political turmoil, his scientific achievements inside the notorious Sainte-Pelagie prison eventually caused a mathematical revolution. The memoir he wrote in prison is the foundation stone for the modern mathematical theory of symmetry.  In 1940, the pacifist and mathematician André Weil, brother of the famous philosopher Simone Weil, found himself in prison awaiting trial for desertion. An Indian friend of Weil's had once joked that "if I could spend six months or a year in prison, I would most certainly be able to prove the Riemann hypothesis" - the greatest unsolved problem of mathematics. Now Weil had the chance to put the theory to the test. During those months in Rouen prison, Weil made a breakthrough on a problem closely linked to Riemann's conjecture. He wrote to his wife: "My mathematics work is proceeding beyond my wildest hopes, and I am even a bit worried - if it is only in prison that I work so well, will I have to arrange to spend two or three months locked up every year?" On hearing of his breakthrough, fellow mathematician Henri Cartan wrote back to Weil: "We're not all lucky enough to sit and work undisturbed like you..."... There are also stories of those condemned by terminal illness who have sought solace in mathematics as a way of surviving beyond their deaths. Julia Robinson was given only years to live after contracting rheumatic fever as a child in the 30s. She dedicated her life to solving one of the 20th century's major unsolved problems: Hilbert's 10th problem about solving equations... Mathematics has also been a sanctuary for those social misfits unable to cope in the turbulent emotional world around them. While fellow humans can react in an unpredictable and contradictory manner, the world of mathematics offers a safe haven where certainty reigns and results don't collapse. Euclid's 2,000-year-old proof that there are infinitely many primes is as valid today as it was in ancient Greece.  Maybe this security is what makes mathematics so appealing to those who suffer from Asperger's syndrome, such as Mark Haddon's character Christopher in The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time. Simon Baron-Cohen's book The Essential Difference documents several leading mathematicians with autistic leanings. Mathematics is responsible for creating and explaining much of the physical world we live in, but it can also offer an alternative world in which to escape the pressures of reality."

Where Did the Prohibition on Combining Seafood and Cheese Come From? - "“It definitely originated in Italy, there’s no doubt about that,” says Julia della Croce, a cookbook author, teacher, writer, and one of America’s foremost experts on Italian cuisine. “Italians are very religious about mixing cheese and fish or seafood, it just isn’t done.” I spoke with several food historians and nobody seems to disagree on this point: The prohibition, and its aggressiveness, come from Italy... A common explanation is that seafood is very delicate and cheese very strong, and that cheese can overpower the flavor of seafood. This is, of course, ridiculous: plenty of seafood items, like clams, mackerel, oysters, and sardines, are very strong in flavor, and plenty of cheeses, like ricotta, mozzarella, queso fresco, and paneer, are very mild. Della Croce says that the Italian objection to seafood and cheese is more based on preference. “The reason it isn’t done is, as the Italians will say if you ask them, they’ll just tell you that it really muddles the flavor of seafood,” she says. “Seafood is just not meant to be served with cheese, the flavors just don’t work together.”... To declare something “traditional” suggests that it is static and unchanging, when of course it must have changed many times before becoming what it is.  In order to create something that can be referred to as “traditional,” a large group of people must decide all at once to dig in their heels and defend against any changes. It naturally follows that there must be some kind of large event to trigger this; otherwise why would everyone simultaneously decide that the way their grandmother made polpetti is the only way?...  “Italy changed enormously after World War II, so people became very protective of their local traditions, because they were eroding away,” she says. “The war ruined Italy. Everything became modernized and Americanized.”... Food is Italy’s greatest cultural export. Easily. Everyone freakin’ loves Italian food. But with increased globalization comes a struggle. Italian food, like widely dispersed cuisines from China and Mexico, would be changed upon landing on other shores. And change, at that time, was something that scared the hell out of Italy, because it seemed inevitable and oppressive and overwhelming. So—and this is obviously a generalization, but one that the data backs up—Italians locked in on what they grew up with. The way their grandmothers did it, that was the only way to do it. Any other way was wrong, and to do it wrong was potentially disastrous... The food thought of as “traditional” Italian food is often, though of course not entirely, from the late 19th century. Pizza margherita, bolognese, risotto, osso buco (in its current form), and many more, can be dated to that era, and no earlier. These were the dishes of the grandmothers of those who survived World War II. They became tradition, even though they are not, objectively speaking, all that old; there are many cookbooks and written descriptions of Italian food from the 18th century and earlier, and they do not mention these dishes. Instead they were the green bean casserole of their time, albeit much tastier. Another element: Italy has always had fierce regional pride. The country itself has only been unified since 1861, and had prior to that been an area of competitive and sometimes hostile individual nations and city-states... It’s worth mentioning here that pretty much everyone can get touchy about the right way to prepare and eat their food. But usually the things people get touchy about are specific dishes, not basic rules like the combination of two widely eaten categories (at least in the West)...   Ken Albala, a food historian and professor at the University of the Pacific, suggested something else: This was originally a medical prohibition. From the time of Hippocrates, in the fourth and third centuries B.C., humorism was the dominant medical theory throughout what is now Italy. The theory relies on balancing of the four humors (humors in this case meaning bodily fluids): black bile, yellow bile, phlegm, and blood. Good health was considered to be a result of proper balancing of the humors. One thing that could throw the humors out of whack, or be used to re-balance them, was food, and types of food were considered to have different effects on the humors."

Meme - lin @_nkemtwin: "Celebrities With Loyal Partners Since Childhood
9. Kobe Bryant and Vanessa Bryant
8. Will Smith and Jada Smith
2. Jay-Z and Beyonce"

Author Richard Brittain attacked reviewer with bottle - "An author tracked down a teenager in Fife and hit her over the head with a bottle after she gave his book a bad review, a court has heard.  Richard Brittain, a former champion on the TV programme Countdown, travelled from England and used Facebook to find Paige Rolland, 18, at her work.  He admitted assaulting Miss Rolland with a bottle to her severe injury on 3 October 2014 at Asda, Glenrothes... Glasgow Sheriff Court heard Brittain uploaded part of a published book of his called The World Rose onto a website called Wattpad, where people can read and critique literature written by others.  Miss Rolland read the excerpt of Brittain's book and left comments about it... a month before the attack on Miss Roland, Brittain stalked a university classmate, Ella Durant, 23, who moved from London to Glasgow.  He used her Twitter and Instagram accounts to find where she worked and turned up on two occasions to speak to her.  Brittain, whose address was given as Palgrave, Bedford, pled guilty to engaging in a course of conduct which caused Miss Durant fear or alarm by repeatedly pursuing her, approaching her, following her and publishing a story about stalking her in September 2014."

Social Experiment Or Attempted Murder? The Morality Of 'The Push' - “The Push sees UK mentalist and magician Derren Brown conduct an elaborate, choreographed, highly manipulative experiment: can he get an entrepreneur who believes he’s attending a legitimate charity fundraiser to push a man off a roof? While Kingston chooses not to push the man to his supposed death, Brown eventually reveals that he has conducted the experiment three more times. And, each time, the participant went through with ‘the push’.

A man who 'hopes he runs out of money' before he dies explains why you may not need as much cash to retire as you think - “"Retirees who had $500,000 or more right before retirement had spent down a median of only 11.5% of that money 20 years later or by the time they died," he writes. And, this pattern held true even for those with smaller savings. "Retirees with less than $200,000 saved up for retirement ... had spent down only one quarter of their assets 18 years after retirement."”

I quit sugar for 6 months and this is what it did to my face and body - ““That said, the daily recommended added sugar is less than 50 grams (about 12 teaspoons), so having some sugar won’t cause inflammation. These studies look at people who eat more than the recommended amount. Generally, skin inflammation presents as pimples or acne, but it may also cause eczema flares, which is linked to dry skin,” she adds. She also says that artificial sweeteners, like aspartame, have been shown to have the opposite effect on skin. “That said, the studies with aspartame use really high doses and are usually performed on animals, so they aren’t the most conclusive.”… “Eating more than the recommended amount of sugar on a daily basis may cause weight gain, which may present as bloating or puffiness. The inflammation that the excessive sugar causes may also cause some slight bloating,” Rizzo says. But the transformation didn’t stop there. Oh no, my energy levels experienced a renaissance of their own. No longer was I subject to the erratic highs and crashing lows that had plagued me for so long. Instead, I found myself sustained by a steady, reliable source of energy that carried me through the day with ease.”

8 surprising (and bizarre) federal tax deductions you can actually claim on your return - “Crutches... Without any certification or prescription. So, technically, even if you bought the crutches to pull a prank on someone or as a prop for the student film you were making, you can claim them as a medical expense…  
Living with your parents... Kind of. The Multigenerational Home Renovation Tax Credit is a new refundable tax credit that applies if you do renovations to create a secondary unit in your home where a senior or disabled adult, such as an elderly parent, would live. You have to make sure both you and the person living with you are considered "qualifying individuals" with a "qualifying" relationship, but if all that checks out, you can claim up to $7,500.  
Food... But only if you're a bike and/or foot courier and you might have to go to court over it. Basically, in 1998, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that a man named Alan Wayne Scott could write off extra food he required due to physical exertion from his job as a bike and foot courier. His argument was that he considered it fuel — much in the same way you can write off fuel for a vehicle if you use it to earn business income. If you want to try your luck, this precedence exists, but it might not be worth ruffling the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)'s feathers over.  
Firefighting and search-and-rescuing... But only if you're a volunteer. You can claim up to $3,000 for the volunteer firefighters' amount or search and rescue volunteers' amount but not both. Also, you must have completed 200 hours of eligible volunteering at either service.”

Scientists have discovered the maximum age a human can live to - “Research conducted in The Netherlands has found that the maximum ceiling life span for a female is 115.7 years. For men, it is slightly lower at 114.1 years but even so, that's a long time. This conclusion was come to by statisticians at Tilburg and Rotterdam's Erasmus University who studied data from 75,000 people who have died in the Netherlands in the last 30 years… These findings correlate with a study carried out in America, where a similar lifespan bracket was discovered by researchers. They determined that a person's maximum lifespan plateaus in their nineties and was unlikely to ever increase beyond 115.”

Kim Jong Un bans dogs and certain haircuts in North Korea - “the national broadcaster had censored a pair of jeans worn by British TV gardener Alan Titchmarsh after a repeat of a BBC show was aired. The offending item of blue denim jeans are viewed as a sign of US imperialism and have been banned in the country since the early 90s… North Korea’s Rejection of Reactionary Thought and Culture Act had an addition made. Officials declared that any woman who wears clothing that does not sit below the knee line defies the principles of “socialist etiquette”. According to an anonymous North Korean resident, the crackdown on women wearing shorts or anything above the knee came amid 30 degree Celsius temperatures… “A few years ago, they were cracking down on wide-legged skirt pants, saying they were Japanese fashion. “Many women are complaining, asking why men can wear shorts and women can't. They are saying that the authorities are discriminating against us.”… Keeping dogs as pets is also banned because it “is incompatible with the socialist lifestyle”. According to a source who spoke to Daily NK, the new rule was told to the Socialist Women Union of Korea… Authorities labelled the practice of keeping dogs as pets as having “the stench of the bourgeoisie”. They claimed: “Dogs are basically meat that’s raised outside in accordance with their nature and then eaten when they die. Therefore, such behaviour is totally unsocialist and must be strictly eliminated.””

Charlie Munger lived in the same home for 70 years: Rich people who build 'really fancy houses' become 'less happy' - “"[Buffett and I] are both smart enough to have watched our friends who got rich build these really fancy houses," Munger said. "And I would say in practically every case, they make the person less happy, not happier." A "basic house" has utility, said Munger, noting that a larger home could help you entertain more people — but that's about it. "It's a very expensive thing to do, and it doesn't do you that much good."

Meme - Enfant: "Maieuh... j'veux pas me laver !"
Femme: "Allons...tu n'es plus un bébé !"
Enfant: "Si je me lave je deviendrais un grand garçon ?"
Femme: "Oui ! Et tu me rendras très heureuse !"
Enfant: "Alors d'accord !"
*L'enfant entre la chambre à gaz d'un camp d'extermination et la femme souriante est est une aufseherin*

Jail for Taylor Swift concert cheat who claimed he was a fan but did not know any of her songs - "A man who was arrested after he was involved in a Taylor Swift concert scam claimed he was a fan of the American pop star during investigations.  But Yang Chenguang was unable to sing any of her songs and could not provide a good reason for why he could not do so.  On March 28, the 29-year-old Chinese national was sentenced to three months’ jail after he pleaded guilty to one charge of criminal trespass and another of cheating.  Swift’s Eras Tour concert at the National Stadium was held over six nights from March 2 to 9 and attracted more than 368,000 concertgoers. It has also been linked to at least 960 victims of ticket scams... In mitigation, Yang, who did not have a lawyer, said this was the first time he had left China and that he was remorseful.  He added that his wife had died two years ago and that he wished to return to China as soon as possible to be with his two children. He promised to teach them not to commit any offences."
"This makes it sound as though it's criminal to claim to be a Taytay fan but not be able to sing her songs."

Coconut Shell Bearing Rescue Message – All Artifacts – The John F. Kennedy Presidential Library & Museum - "On the night of August 1, 1943, the PT boat commanded by Lieutenant John F. Kennedy was sunk after being hit by a Japanese destroyer in Blackett Strait, south of Kolombangara in the Solomon Islands. Four days after they had been given up as lost, Kennedy and his surviving crew were discovered by Biuku Gasa and Eroni Kumana, two indigenous Solomon Islands scouts working for the Allies. Kennedy carved the message into this coconut husk that 11 crew members were still alive and passed it along to two Gasa and Kumana, who carried the message to a nearby Australian coast watcher. The chance encounter with the islanders resulted in the rescue of PT-109's crew.  Joseph P. Kennedy had the inscribed coconut shell fragment encased in plastic and mounted to a wood base for his son. The object became a treasured memento, one that served as a reminder of a turning point in young Kennedy's life that would shape him as a man and a president. He kept it prominently displayed on the desks he used throughout his political career. The coconut husk was on the President's desk in the Oval Office on the day he died."

Meme - "When she doesnt look like her pic, but you just drove 8 hours *man having sex with alien*"

Meme - Chaya Raichik: "It's so cringey to see middle-aged men wearing Nirvana brand t-shirts like they're trying to fit in with young people. Like shouldn't you have your own style from your own era?"

Meme - "Top 7 Italian Restaurants in N.J.
Olive Garden Italian Restaurant
Olive Garden Italian Restaurant
Olive Garden Italian Restaurant
Olive Garden Italian Restaurant
Olive Garden Italian Restaurant
Olive Garden Italian Restaurant
Olive Garden Italian Restaurant"

What evil prank have you pulled off? : AskReddit - "Two of my friends have never met eachother. Before they spoke I told both of them that the other is a bit deaf. They shouted at eachother for a few minutes before they realized that I'm an asshole."

The Louder the Monkey, the Smaller Its Balls, Study Finds - "Howler monkeys are the loudest land animals on Earth, capable of bellowing at volumes of 140 decibels, which is on the level of gunshots or firecrackers. Not surprisingly, male howlers frequently use this power to advertise their sexual fitness, catcalling females with their ear-splitting roars... a louder, small-balled monkey is more likely to develop a harem of females with whom he has exclusive breeding access. The quieter, well-endowed monkeys, on the other hand, tend to end up in larger groups containing many males and females that copulate freely with each other. In this non-exclusive group, males compete for paternity quite literally with their balls. The bigger a male's sperm count, the more he is to edge out all the other males that are mating with the same females. In this way, howler monkeys have evolved two sexual strategies—calls versus balls—to the exclusion of each other... Naturally, Knapp warns against anthropomorphizing these findings, and she is completely right"

Opinion: School boards should focus on academics and order - "After months of meetings, the Waterloo Region District School Board in Ontario finally released its new strategic plan. Its key feature? An upside-down organizational chart that puts students at the top and the director of education at the bottom. Of course, the chart is nonsense. The district has not given students the power to hire and fire staff, nor can students tell the director of education which programs to cut or even what time they want school to begin in the morning. Anyone who wants to know the actual chain of authority in the district won’t get much help from this chart. The rest of the strategic plan isn’t much better. It’s filled with lofty promises about “preparing students for the future” and catchphrases such as “celebrating the gifts of each and every student.” The plan also focuses on preparing students for the 22nd century — when most current students will be retired or dead. What we don’t see in this strategic plan are concrete measures to improve academic achievement. Sadly, Waterloo is far from the only school board to focus on everything except academics. The Toronto District School Board recently dropped its skills-based entrance requirements for specialized schools and the Vancouver School Board has eliminated its honours programs, mediocritizing schools in the name of “equity.”... the Ontario Human Rights Commission released a damning report (Right to Read) about Ontario’s approach to literacy in public schools. According to the report, students need much more phonics instruction than many of them are currently getting in school... School boards also need to ensure that students can learn in safe and orderly classrooms. Prioritizing student safety means giving teachers the power to maintain order and discipline in their classrooms. Violence in school should never be tolerated. This might seem obvious but it’s a serious issue in some schools. For example, there have been numerous media reports about serious violent incidents in Saunders Secondary School, which is part of the Thames Valley School District based in London, Ontario. A recent CBC story quoted an anonymous teacher who described Saunders as a “tinderbox of violence” where students regularly challenge teachers to fistfights. Incredibly, instead of addressing the problem, school board officials argued that the violence at Saunders was no worse than at other schools. The district’s director of education also wants to reduce the number of student suspensions, which might make sense if suspensions were unwarranted but is absurd when dealing with real incidents of violence. It would also help if school boards hired fewer consultants and put those resources into classrooms instead. In far too many cases, consultants feel the need to justify their own positions by recommending the creation of additional programs. The end result is that teachers spend less time with their students because they’re required to attend professional development sessions staged by these consultants.  Finally, school boards, particularly in large urban centres, need to empower families by encouraging more choice within the system. Instead of making all schools follow the same cookie-cutter model, schools should be able to specialize and families choose the school they want. The Edmonton Public School Board has successfully used this model for decades. More school boards should follow the Edmonton model."
From 2022

Meme - "Workout ball
$15
Sold
Seller: Jeff
Description: Used only once, cleaned with vinegar. Still in great condition. *purple ball with 2 handles and dildo sticking out*"

Michael Shermer on X - "Question:  Is the "sharp rise in adolescent depression" (and anxiety disorders, eating disorders, suicidal ideation, ADHD, etc.) due to exogenous causes like social media/smart phones, parental coddling, life history theory, etc?   What if the cause is endogenous—an artifact of the pathologizing of things teens used to normally get upset about (and recover from quickly), and instead are now being labeled with diagnoses like depression, ADHD, autism, anxiety disorders, etc., and then a feedback loop is created in which the kids are instructed to ruminate, cogitate, and wallow in their negative emotions, which only fuels the problem, and THAT is what has caused this spike?  I don't know the answer but am curious what readers here think."

Meme - Glinda: "We've had to adapt, Dorothy. Nobody uses imperial weights these days."
"The Wizard of 28g"

Ultimately, there are 10 Basic X-Men Plots : i will not apologize for art - "1. Aliens ruin Scott Summers’ day
2. The teenage female audience surrogate (Kitty, Jubilee, Armor, etc.) does something cool
3. Bigots ruin Scott Summers’ day
4. Storm wrestles with her leadership position
5. Time travelers ruin Scott Summers’ day
6. Everything connects back to Wolverine
7. Literal demons rise up from Hell to ruin Scott Summers’ day
8. Professor Xavier turns out to have done a Bad Thing
9. The other X-Men ruin Scott Summers’ day
10. The Phoenix shows up (most likely to ruin Scott Summers’ day)"

Race and False Hate Crime Narratives

From 2021:

Race and False Hate Crime Narratives

"The reaction to the mass shootings in Boulder, Colorado, and Atlanta, Georgia, over the last week has revealed how invested the Democratic establishment is in one all-powerful narrative. Both shootings produced an immediate response from the media, Democratic politicians, and activists—that the slaughters were the result of white supremacy and that white Americans are the biggest threat facing the US. That interpretation was reached, in the case of the Boulder shooting, on the slimmest of evidence, and in the case of the Atlanta shooting, in the face of contradictory facts.

After the Boulder supermarket attacks, social media lit up with gloating pronouncements that the shooter was a violent white male and part of what Vice President Kamala Harris’s niece declared (in a since-deleted tweet) to be the “greatest terrorist threat to our country.” (Video of the handcuffed shooter being led away by the police appeared to show a white male.) Now that the shooter’s identity has been revealed as Syrian-American and his tirades against the “Islamophobia industry” unearthed, that line of thought has been quietly retired and replaced with the stand-by Democratic response to mass shootings—demands for gun control.

But the false narrative about the Atlanta spa shootings still has legs. It represents a double lie—first, that the massacre was the product of Trump-inspired xenophobic hatred, and second, that whites are the biggest perpetrators of violence against Asians. The most striking aspect of these untruths is the fact that they were fabricated in plain sight and in open defiance of reality...

 [Robert Aaron] Long told the police that he had targeted the three Atlanta spas to purge himself of his lust and his addiction to pornography. This explanation is wholly credible. All three establishments have been investigated for prostitution, and Long had frequented at least two of them. Customer reviews of the massage parlors attest to their provision of sexual services. Long has said nothing about Asian responsibility for the coronavirus. Indeed, if he were upset by a supposed connection between Asians and the pandemic, one would expect him to have avoided close contact with Asians. By all accounts, Long was tormented by an inability to control his sexual thoughts and behavior, which he believed to be a violation of his Christian faith. He also said nothing about hatred of Asians... Long intended to target a business in Florida next that made pornography, he told police. The employees there were unlikely to be Asian.

The uncontradicted evidence for Long’s motivation and the absence of evidence for a white supremacist impulse were no impediment to the narrative. Anyone who doubted that narrative was complicit in white supremacy. Reuters was reprimanded on social media for the headline: “Sex addiction, not racial hatred, may have driven suspect in Georgia spa shootings.” The news organization’s revised attempt—“Motive in Georgia spa shootings uncertain, but Asian-Americans fearful”—earned it no absolution. “We don’t let mass casualty shooters diagnose themselves,” sniffed a terrorism expert at Georgia State University. Needless to say, had Long told the police that he was seeking revenge on Asians for COVID, his self-diagnosis would have been taken as definitive proof.

Both Harris and Biden obliquely referred to the question of motive while dismissing its relevance... 

If the fact that 75 percent of Long’s victims were Asian turns the shootings into an anti-Asian hate crime, then the fact that 100 percent of Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa’s victims in Boulder were white should turn that shooting into an anti-white hate crime...

Nowhere was the compulsion to buttress the meme about white supremacist violence clearer than in the treatment of the actual street violence that Asians have long suffered...

In March 2020, four teenage girls assaulted a 51-year-old woman on a bus in the Bronx, hitting her with an umbrella and accusing her of spreading the coronavirus. Here was a more promising story of Trump-inspired COVID xenophobia, if only the girls had been a different race.

In fact, the suspects in all of these cases were black; the news reports rarely mentioned that detail. Had the suspects been white, their race would have led each news report, as it did for Robert Aaron Long. A former member of the Oakland police department’s robbery undercover suppression team tells me that this racial pattern of attack and its lack of coverage is longstanding. No one cares about Asian robbery victims, he says, “We used to follow around elderly Asians, waiting for the bad guys to start circling. This has been one of my long-term frustrations. They are pretending to care now but ironically blaming it on white supremacy”—even though the suspects in Asian robbery attacks are almost exclusively, in this cop’s experience, black.

The New York Police Department compiles the most extensive data on hate crimes in the country. These data confirm the Oakland officer’s observation. A black New Yorker is over six times as likely to commit a hate crime against an Asian as a white New Yorker...

Inner-city animus against Asian small business owners is also longstanding, as the 1992 Los Angeles riots and the 1990 Big Apple grocery boycott in New York City recall. The predominantly black character of the attacks on elderly Asians may be euphemistically acknowledged in only one context: disparate impact. Racial justice advocates oppose a law enforcement response to those attacks because, the New York Times explained, going to the police would have a disparate impact on “Black and Latino communities.” Actors Daniel Kim and Daniel Wu had offered a $25,000 reward to anyone who helped find the assailant in the January 31st assault on the 91-year-old man and two other Asians in Oakland. Teen Vogue contributor Kim Tran criticized them both for failing to understand “why it’s problematic to offer 25k for information about a Black man in Oakland.” In response to a polite objection, she added: “this looks a lot like a bounty on a Black person funded by Asian American celebrities.” According to Time magazine, the reward underscored the problem of how to “tackle anti-Asian violence without relying on law enforcement institutions that have historically targeted Black and brown communities.” Neither Time nor Kim Tran explicitly said that anti-Asian violence is predominantly black—we are left to infer that for ourselves.

In disparate impact analysis, it is the government response to antisocial behavior that is the problem, not the behavior itself. A supervising attorney with the Racial Justice Unit at Legal Aid in New York City told the New York Times: “I’ve rarely seen people who are more socially privileged be the ones accused of hate crimes. Often what you end up seeing is people of color being accused of hate crimes.” Maybe that is because those are the people disproportionately committing hate crimes. But that possibility must not be granted. Biden chastised the country for its silence about anti-Asian violence. The reason for that silence, however, is that blacks are the primary drivers of this violence. Acknowledging these assaults only became acceptable when there was a white perpetrator, even if his motive did not fit the story being told.

Two other strategies have emerged for ducking the reality of anti-Asian violence. The first of these is a retreat into denial. Claire Jean Kim, a professor of political science and Asian American studies at the University of California, Irvine, told Slate that she was asked by Asian reporters if black people are going after Asians. Those reporters had apparently seen the videos. Kim pushed back against what is patently obvious. “I kept asking them, What’s the evidence? Are there other videos? There was a rush to judgment about these cases all being about Black people going after Asians, and when you think about the tendency in American society to criminalize Black people, it’s a problem to reach for that frame and apply it before the evidence warrants it.” [emphasis in original] A COVID-xenophobic frame was applied to Long before the evidence warranted it, but never mind.

The second strategy is simply to change the subject. In a Los Angeles Times column, Erika D. Smith notes that activists are “blaming white supremacy, systemic racism and the societal constructs that support them” for “racially motivated crimes,” rather than “focusing on individual perpetrators and demanding more policing.” In her Slate interview, Claire Jean Kim complained that focusing on the “Asian-Black thing” takes “attention away from the larger structures of power in which they’re embedded.” A racial justice educator, Bianca Mabute-Louie, warned about focusing on interracial (i.e., black-Asian) conflict, since doing so would deflect from recognizing that “racism is a result of white supremacy,” as Time put it. It turns out that white supremacy has been bashing frail Asians over the head, not individual criminals.

White supremacy is also apparently getting whites beaten up. Blacks commit 88 percent of all interracial violence between whites and blacks, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Yet on March 22nd, 2021, CNN ran a special entitled “Afraid: Fear in America’s Communities of Color,” as if whites were putting US minorities at risk. The move to blame white supremacy for black-perpetrated attacks on Asians results in a strange linguistic divide. Press reports refer to activists condemning “anti-Asian racism” and fighting anti-Asian “hate.” The intended referent in such observations is whites. But the actual referent is blacks.

The lie about white supremacist violence is not innocuous. It forms the basis of the Biden administration’s policy in national security and in a host of domestic welfare programs. It is the pretext for Big Tech and Big Media’s silencing of speech. And the shamelessness with which that lie is constructed grows more brazen by the day. It must be fought with facts before it irrevocably alters our culture."

Links - 24th April 2024 (1 - Iran Attack)

The Iranian Connection - "With the recent Houthi attacks on international shipping and the retaliatory bombing of military targets in Yemen by the US and UK, the conflict that commenced with Hamas’s 7 October attacks has broadened into a wider field of operations. The links between the Houthi, Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran may at first glance seem opaque: these actors are all from different parts of the Middle East and some are Sunni, others Shi’a. Furthermore, even within the context of the century-old Arab–Zionist conflict, Hamas’s attacks were startlingly savage. Any reasonable person could have foreseen the fierce Israeli response to the atrocities of 7 October and the likelihood that, as a result, Palestinian statehood would be delayed for another generation at least. Even Hamas’s former Minister of Communications, Yosef Almansi, has denounced the attacks, claiming that they set the organisation’s cause back 200 years and were “the opposite of the religion of Islam. It is heresy, madness… not accepted by logic, religion, or common sense.” So, why did Hamas attack and what is holding together the alliance of their allies? It is difficult to discern a rationale for the attack when we consider it entirely within the scope of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—especially given that terrorist groups often lukewarm to the Palestinian cause, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Yemen’s Houthi, have also joined the fray against Israel, while militias in Iraq have simultaneously stepped up attacks against American targets there. Clearly, Hamas’s actions are merely a component of a wider Middle Eastern conflict. To understand the events of 7 October, we must begin by considering the timing of the attack. In the preceding months, Saudi Arabia had been moving towards a rapprochement with Israel... The Israeli defensive response to the biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust rekindled widespread opposition to the Jewish state throughout the Middle East. Citing support for the Palestinian people, Bahrain recalled its ambassador to Israel, while other signatories to the Accords have faced growing support for Hamas within their own populations. The US-brokered Israel–Saudi deal is now reportedly “in tatters.” A domestically produced Saudi bomb leading to the realignment of power across the Persian Gulf now seems like a distant prospect. Iran remains ascendant. This raises a couple of questions. The first is whether the Hamas massacre of 7 October was a strategic act designed to preserve Iranian nuclear hegemony in the Gulf. The second question is more puzzling. Given the growing desire many Middle Eastern countries have shown to normalize diplomatic relations with Israel, why is Iran a holdout? If traditional foes such as Saudi Arabia and Israel can countenance a peace agreement, then why not Israel and Iran? The answer to the first question seems clear: Hamas probably undertook the massacre at the behest of Iran. The Islamic Republic provides Hamas with training, weapons and nearly $100 million in annual funding. Furthermore, not only did the highest levels of the Iranian government give the go-ahead for the attack, but Iran also provided special training in the months leading up to the attack—such as in the use of paragliders—as well as additional weapons and funding specifically earmarked for the commission of the atrocity... To understand the rationale for 7 October, we need to go back to the birth of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979. When Ayatollah Khomeini ascended to the role of Supreme Leader of Iran during the Iranian Revolution of 1979, he promulgated his fiercely anti-Israel philosophy—a worldview that was both anti-Zionist and antisemitic. Khomeini used the familiar tropes common among Arab countries at the time. Israel, he maintained, was a colonial-settler state, a lackey of the United States, and the usurper of Islam’s rightful claim to Jerusalem. But while such anti-Israel rhetoric has become more moderate in much of the Arab world over the last few decades, Iran’s posture has become ever more fanatical and strident. Iran’s annual Quds (Jerusalem) Day (held on the last Friday of Ramadan) features missile parades, anti-American, anti-Israel and antisemitic speeches, the trampling and burning of Israeli flags and chants of “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.” Iranian anti-Zionism has far less to do with the plight of Palestinians than with hatred of Israelis and Jews. In fact, the Islamic Republic is deeply suspicious of the Palestinian liberation movement... The Iranian government uses anti-Israeli and anti-American propaganda to galvanize domestic support for the regime and provide external scapegoats for the country’s ills. Such rhetoric can also boost support for Iran among those in the Muslim world who share its antipathy towards Israel. But Iran’s hatred of Israel is more than just sloganeering and rhetoric: the Islamic Republic actively seeks the destruction of the Jewish nation, even at the cost of both money and lives... Middle Eastern geography plays a crucial role in the story of Mahdi’s return. Many of the countries that play important roles in Twelver Messianism have also been the focus of contemporary Iranian-sponsored terrorism... In Ahmadinejad’s apocalyptic visions, Jews and Israel are the primary obstacles to Mahdi’s return. Senior Iranian clergy have also declared that Israel and the Jews must be vanquished to pave the way for the return of the Hidden Imam and the redemption of the Ummah... Any explanation of 7 October that views the atrocity merely as part of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict will be incomplete. The rationale for the massacre—and for the parallel actions of terrorist groups in Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen—is to be found within a complex tapestry of Middle Eastern politics, antisemitism, Shi’a theology, and eschatological visions of an Islamic Jerusalem. If a lasting peace between Israel and the Palestinians were ever to be achieved, this would not guarantee the Jewish state’s security, so long as Jerusalem remained central to the Islamic Republic’s ambitions... There is tragic precedent for the idea that a nation might sacrifice itself to fulfill its genocidal fantasies. Even as it faced defeat, Nazi Germany devoted manpower and resources to the murder of six million Jews, resources desperately needed for the war effort. Germany prioritized dreams of a world without Jews over its own survival. Israel’s struggle is also our own. From Tehran to Yemen, chants of “death to Israel” are always accompanied by chants of “death to America.” And by “America,” they mean not just the United States but the entirety of western society, a society that many radicals hope will be destroyed in a future global Islamic caliphate."
Left wingers love to slam evangelical Christian support for Israel as trying to bring on the end times, but brown people have no agency

OSINTdefender on X - "U.S. President Biden during a Press Conference earlier today was asked how Imminent he thought an Attack on Israel was, for which he stated, “I don’t want to give away Secure Information, but my Expectation is sooner than later” with his Message to Iran being “Don’t.”"
AG on X - "After the US took out Soleimani, arguably the second most important figure of the terrorist regime, Trump came out and announced the US had 52 targets picked out in Iran if they respond overly aggressively.   Iran launched a retaliatory strike on bases in Iraq, but warned Iraq beforehand and limited their attack in a way that was unlikely to cause casualties.   Weakness lends itself to misinterpretation and escalation. That’s what we face now."
AG on X - "Even the message is weak. Notice rhetoric presumption that Iran will attack soon and nothing can be done about it. No clear explanation of the consequences of doing so. Just general statements about Us defending Israel. Only the terrorists Israel took out were our enemy too."
Matan Hazanov on X - "He said in prior statements that the US defense of Israel is "ironclad" in the case of a direct attack by Iran.  They have also moved warships & prepared US forces to respond.  I doubt Iran is not getting the message. But Biden clearly doesn't speak well & appears weak. That's true."
Aaron Smith on X - "We were supposed to be ironclad allies of Israel against Hamas, as well. However, now those votes in Michigan and Minnesota have rusted the heck out of that iron"

American Anti-War Activists Cheer for Iran’s War - "About 300 anti-war activists crowded into the basement of the Teamsters Union’s headquarters on Saturday to hear organizers from all over the country describe their plans to disrupt the Democratic National Convention this August. Joe Biden’s backing of Israel since Hamas’s October 7 attack has turned these left-wing radicals against their own party.  “It’s really inspiring to see that people are just as enthusiastic, and maybe even more enthusiastic, to march on the DNC as they are to march on the RNC,” says Omar Florez, a Milwaukee-based activist. “We can thank Genocide Joe and our movement for that.”    But then a man stumbles to the podium, wiping sweat from his forehead. He grabs the microphone to announce that the Islamic regime of Iran has launched missiles and drones heading straight toward Israel... The crowd, all wearing black N95s, erupts into applause. Someone in the back lowers their mask to send a celebratory whistle soaring throughout the room.  The man at the podium, Hatem Abudayyeh, heads the U.S. Palestinian Community Network, “a purported community group which, on information and belief, is an affiliate of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a designated terror organization based in Gaza”... “This is when this country and the world needs us because the United States is going to, quote unquote, defend the criminal Israeli state,” says Abudayyeh, whose home was raided by the FBI in 2010 as part of an investigation “concerning the material support of terrorism.”   “We have to assume that the United States is going to try to retaliate against Iran.”  After the boos and calls of “shame” subside, Abudayyeh says it is “incumbent” upon Americans to “stop the United States from expanding this war and hitting Iran.”  “We’ve got to be the strong, powerful anti-war movement that we are,” he says, placing the microphone down and exiting the stage.   The crowd immediately began chanting, “Hands off Iran.” A woman in a hot pink gas mask, wielding a matching neon cane and dressed in a “Protect Trans Kids” t-shirt, throws her fist in the air. Nearby, a service poodle is taking a nap under the chair of his owner, who is wearing a leather harness over his t-shirt. Then the group that has joined here from cities across America—Seattle, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles—cheers and claps in celebration.   Joe Iosbaker, an organizer with the Freedom Road Socialist Organization, which called October 7 a “good turn of events” in its press release about the terrorist attacks, tells me he supports Iran. His organization has since released a statement backing Iran, where citizens gathered to shout “Death to America” during their nation’s strike against Israel... before news of the attack broke, at a “breakout session” on “the anti-war movement,” Shabbir Rizvi, an organizer with Anti-War Committee Chicago, taught participants how to chant “death to Israel” and “death to America” in Farsi... “Iran is part of the resistance,” said the woman, who flew in that morning from New Orleans, where she’s been part of an effort to disrupt Israel-bound shipments in her hometown. “Yemen and Iran and Hezbollah, who are also a militant group in Lebanon, and the Syrian government are all parts of the arc of resistance.”   A smile creeps across her face as she tells me: “They’re part of the arc of resistance because the enemies are Israel and the USA.”"
The terrorism supporters once again admitting that they want Israel's enemies to be able to kill as many Israelis as they want, but Israel is not allowed to defend itself

Pro-Palestinian protesters chant 'death to America' and light US flag ON FIRE while NYPD cops seemingly stand idle - as demonstrators flood streets after Iran's missile attack on Israel - "Outside Brooklyn Borough Hall, another protester burned an American flag to cinders amid cheers of jubilation on Monday. In the background, a man chants: 'America falls today. America falls now. America will forever fall.'... Video of the dramatic scene in the Bay Area showed a large group of police standing in front of the stuck vehicles as protestors held up a large sign that said: 'Stop the world for Gaza.'... The protest, which was organized by Chicago Dissenters, said that they decided to block the airport because it is 'one of the largest in the country' that should not be in business 'while Palestinians suffer at the hands of American funded bombing by Israel.'  They decided to target the airport in an attempt to 'disrupt Boeing's operations,' because the airplane manufacturer is 'sending fighter jets and bombs to support Israel's bombardment of Gaza.'... People took to social media and commented on the protest as one said: 'It's past time to criminalize obstructing interstate highways. 30 days in county jail is more than appropriate,' and tagged Illinois Governor JB Pritzker.   Others commented on police officers doing 'nothing.'   A person commented: 'Why do the cops just stand there, every time, and allow these upsets? Every. Single. Time.'"
Clearly, just because you criticise your country does not mean you hate it, so if you criticise protestors who shout "Death to America", you're just a fascist who doesn't accept dissenting opinions
Blocking vital infrastructure is only terrorism when the left disapproves of the cause

Libs of TikTok on X - "BREAKING: Pro-Palestinian protesters just blocked the entrance to Seattle’s International Airport as police stand by and do nothing. People are forced to get out of their cars and walk to the terminals.  Today they blocked O’Hare airport, the Golden Gate Bridge, a highway in Oregon, the Brooklyn Bridge, and held protests in NYC."
Caroline Glick on X - "Iranian reporter @Vahid_Beheshti  revealed an internal IRGC document between two senior commanders admitting that the efforts to cripple transportation and shipping on April 15 is an IRGC operation. These people are literally operating as Iranian regime agents. https://x.com/Vahid_Beheshti/status/1779786659229298775 I discuss in my latest IN FOCUS. https://youtube.com/watch?v=tNQK3L"

Brianna Wu on X - "I protested Bush and Iraq War II so much I ended up on his ludicrous terrorist watch list that targeted mainstream anti-war organizers.   I CERTAINLY never chanted “Death to America.” I never worked with anyone that chanted “Death to America.” And if I had, I would’ve asked them to leave.   Something different and sick is growing in our movement."
Why did Israel force Iran to attack it?!
If you are anti-war and yet still want to destroy Israel and the US, the cope must either be that you don't really mean "Death" or that you want them to destroy themselves on their own (then again, at least for the US, that strategy seems to be working)

Melissa Chen on X - "True progressives, rationally speaking, should be Western chauvinists.   Because the West remains the only place where progressive ideas flourish.  Instead Western progressives stan for the most intolerant, illiberal leaders around the world and actively root for the demise of the nations not just willing to tolerate them but actually celebrate them."
Rio Veradonir on X - "This is because “progressive” is a euphemism for regressive NeoMarxism. The actual goal of most so-called “progressives” is the deconstruction of liberal institutions. The people who are and should be “western chauvinists” are classical liberals."
Lama Bob on X - "They hate white judeo-christians more"
Woo AF on X - "It's a virtue signal; if 90% of Muslims had a Nordic phenotype, they wouldn't be doing this."
Joe Moore ⚡️ on X - "Progressive take the worst possible societies with the least progressive culture and pretend to be shocked that they haven’t achieved and blame the west."
Andrew Wong 🇺🇸 on X - "Pay attention to how these "progressives" mock, hate, loathe, and despise Judeo-Christian civilization aka Western civilization aka Jews and Christians.    Yet, they open their arms to regressive followers of Islam and warmly embrace this religion.  It's weird but not surprising that they keep shouting Islamophobia if you question how regressive some parts of Islam and how it's followers practice their religion but never shout out or invent Christianophobia or Judeophobia when many of their fellow left wing activists attack Jews and their synanogues and Christians and their churches."

Swann Marcus on X - "In the last Gallup poll, Iran had a 1% "very favorable" rating in the US and every one of those people tweets 100 times a day"
Wilfred Reilly on X - "This is one of the best summaries of twitter I have every heard. Almost literally every high IQ neurotic who holds a position like "Tired sex with your lover is rape" or "I still double-mask for COVID" has a twitter account."

Piers Morgan on X - "Israel must show restraint. I fear Netanyahu won’t."
Joe Walsh on X:"- Huh? Israel is under attack right now, sirens are going off in Jerusalem, this is Iran’s first ever direct military attack on Israel, and you tweet this? What a horrible, cowardly, anti-Israel thing to tweet. What “restraint” did Iran show tonight? Shame on you @piersmorgan."
Piers Morgan on X - "Hi Joe, always good to hear your thoughtful & intelligent contribution to global debates. Israel nullified 99% of the missiles. It’s time for calm heads to prevail to avoid a wider war in the region, and for war-mongering, ignorant & inflammatory twerps like you to pipe down."
Noam Blum on X - "Your bullet proof vest stopped the bullets and that should be punishment enough for the person who shot you."
John Rasco on X - "Let's see how Iran deals with 300+ missiles and drones, in a completely proportionate Israeli response. We stand with Israel!"

Thread by @sfrantzman on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "Today the narrative among some is that Iran’s unprecedented massive attack with missiles and drones is just “symbolic” and didn’t harm much so therefore it can be shrugged off.  That was the same mentality about the rocket fire from Gaza two decades ago and also the Hezbollah rocket fire and the Houthi attacks. The always change the goal posts so hundreds or thousands of missiles are no big deal. And then when Hamas massacres 1,000 people and takes 250 hostage then they are surprised. If you don’t take one missile being fired as a threat then it becomes two and then ten and 100 and 1,000. The fact is that systematically Iran has been allowed to spread drone and missile terror around the Middle East and also sent drones to Russia to terrorize Ukrainians. Did the same people who say it was just “symbolic” say that when missiles and drones rain down on Ukrainian civilians? The fact is that the decision to ignore Hamas rockets and then Hezbollah rockets and then Houthi attacks and then Iraqi militia attacks and now Iran’s attacks is destroying the region. Air defenses are not a magic wand OR A SUBSTITUTE FOR POLICY AND STRATEGY.  Countries that dismiss these attacks will find they get worse and worse. That’s what happened with Hamas and Hezbollah and Israel’s answer has been to evacuate the borders but it has no strategy to defeat them and end the threat. And these groups know this. It always starts with self delusion and 3D chess of saying “well no one was harmed in the attack” but eventually people are harmed and then one evacuates the borders and surrenders part of the country to these attacks and then hostages are taken and people massacred. It’s a bad cycle to enter Hamas was emboldened by a decade of wars where Israel didn’t retaliate and just “managed” the conflict or wanted to “shrink” the conflict until it blew up. Conflicts can’t be managed forever. It’s not a policy, it’s attrition and it’s a losing prospect. Israel has to find a way to break this cycle.  Entering into the Hamas-Hezbollah equation with Iran and the Houthis and PIJ and the PMU in Iraq has emboldened all of them and let them dictate the time and place of attacks and surrenders initiative on all fronts under the delusion that air defenses are enough and that they alone are a strategy and policy. The fact is that having walls is not a strategy. Athens learned this during the Pelopenssian war and so did Byzantium. Walls are just a way to postpone the inevitable defeat. Israel must rethink this absence of a clear strategy because while it looks phenomenal now to intercept 200 drones and missiles, the larger picture requires a next step. One the one hand April 14 was important for air defenses and an unprecedented defeat of drones and ballistic missiles but that’s just a tactic, the next step is to form these various fronts into a strategy and stop letting Iran have the initiative on every front."
Left wingers defend attacks on Israel by claiming that they don't do (much) damage, so they don't matter (weird, given how they judge left wing policies on their intentions, not their outcomes). Then when October 7th came along, the mask dropped and they celebrated the deaths

Visegrád 24 on X - "More and more videos coming out of Iran revealing that a lot of drones and missiles malfunctioned and fell down on Iranian towns and villages. The Islamic regime is a risk to the lives of all decent Iranians who don’t want the Mullahs to rule their lives"
Damn Zionists! Why would they do this?!

Israel B. Bitton on X - "Anyone who thinks Saturday’s Iranian drone-missile barrage against Israel was “the big attack” is mistaken and obviously not paying attention.  It was merely a test.  What did Iran learn? A few very useful facts.  Iran can, without any immediate consequence, shut down the airspace of nearly the entire Middle East.  Iran can paralyze Israel as the entire country is forced to wait in/near shelters and brace themselves for an unknown onslaught.  And Iran knows that with only some 200 drones and missiles, with Israel on high alert, and the attack telegraphed to the world days in advance, it managed to do the above but not really penetrate Israel’s defensive umbrella.  Yet, this was NOT a military failure.   It was a military operation to both save face and back up their belligerent tone in the aftermath of Israel’s elimination of a top IRGC general, and to test how many drones and missiles it’ll take to overwhelm Israel’s and its allies’ defenses.   200 drones and missiles fired. How many came from Lebanon during the Iranian onslaught? 50 or so. Yet Hezbollah posses more than 10,000 rockets!  Anyone still convinced that this was “the great attack” Iran has been promising rather than a prelude to something far more devastating?!  What this means is that those folks like @JoeBiden  parading the idea that Israel ought to “pocket the win” for having successfully defended itself against a major (but relatively minor) onslaught are simply telling Israel to set the stage for the next round which will be inevitably worse and exact a significant human toll. Because if Iran was brazen enough to attack Israel with pathetic slow-flying drones waiting to be shot out of the sky although they possess a massive arsenal of far more sophisticated missiles, why the hell would anyone assume, let alone promote the notion that this is as far as Iran will go and therefore Iran should be let off the hook with no consequence?!  Israel knows this. America does too. But politics is politics so electoral decisions will determine how far Israel’s retaliatory hand can officially extend.   That said, considering Israel is in a Catch-22 — no response emboldens Iran, too harsh a response weakens the anti-Iran coalition — we can expect to see sabotage at Iran’s nuclear facilities on a level we have never seen before, ie nearly total destruction to the point of being unusable (or maybe that’s just wishful thinking).  Either way, none of that will change the simple fact that what we saw on Saturday is a drop in the bucket compared to what Iran is actually capable of, which isn’t to boost Iran’s Napoleon-sized ego but to reinforce why the corrupt and genocidal Iranian regime under @khamenei_ir  must be dismantled and disabled!  Remember, children: Any regime that mercilessly beats and abuses their own wives and daughters in the name of bettering their society is one guaranteed to fall and the world is always better off when they do.  The days of reckoning approach…"

Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺 on X - "Have you ever seen a larger traitor to the Muslim world than the king of Jordan?"
Sofia 🥔 on X - "Why would a Jordanian king support Iran? Do y’all even understand what’s going on around you?"

Meme - Richard Hanania @RichardHanania: "Knocking off Iran would not be like other wars. The regime is hated by its people, and the main opposition is liberal. In other Muslim countries we've tried to overthrow the main opposition has been Islamists. Completely different situations. We should stand with brave Iranians."
David Sacks @Davidsacks: "Everything old is new again.
'I think things have gotten so bad inside Iraq, from the standpoint of the Iraqi people, my belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators.' - Dick Cheney"
Clearly Cheney was wrong and we now know Iran better than we knew Iraq

‘You Distorted The Story To Make The Islamic Republic The Victim’: Iranian Attorney Blasts Iran Sympathizers In Viral Video - "a young female British-Iranian attorney condemning supporters of the despotic, theocratic Iranian regime, the world’s largest state supporter of terrorism. Elica Le Bon... saying, “It’s become very apparent that you haven’t been listening to anything that we’ve had to say for the past two years... “We’ve had to watch over the past 24 hours people clambering onto the internet to exclaim that Iran has the right to defend itself,” she stated. “In what capacity have you distorted the story to make the Islamic Republic the victim? That’s I think what we’re most curious about. When we were screaming for the past two years that they were lynching us, where were you? When we were screaming that they were killing Iranian women for not wearing a hijab, where were you? When they were lynching Iranian men from cranes for protesting, where were you? When we were explaining that this is a terrorist-occupying force, where were you?”  “But all of a sudden, everyone’s graduated from Instagram school of law to say that this is a violation of international law and Iran has the right to defend itself,” she snapped... “If you want to talk about an act of war, just a few days ago a federal court determined that the attacks on Israeli embassies and Jewish centers in Argentina were conducted by the Islamic Republic and Hezbollah. That was in the ’90s. That was in the ’90s. Was that an act of war?”  “How about the terror proxies that the Islamic Republic has created to foster regional instability? What did you think that they were there for? What did you think Hezbollah was there for? Hamas. Houthis, the militia groups in Iraq and Syria: Did you think that they were there to instigate a system of public schooling, education, to feed the poor, house the unhoused? What did you think that they were there for?”  “Is that an act of war? Was October 7 an act of war? Are the rockets that Hezbollah fires into Northern Israel on a near-daily basis an act of war? And so when the senior IRGC commanders meet up with Hezbollah in an IRGC military base, okay, not an Iranian embassy, and Israel strikes, your response is to say that that is an act of war?” “If you would listen to us for the past two years, much less the past 45 years, you’d know that Iranians don’t want war with Israel,” she declared. “We want peace with Israel. Iranian people inside of Iran have come out and said this over and over and over again. It is you that wants war with Israel. It’s your hatred for Israel and your hatred for Jews that’s pulling us into a war that we didn’t ask for. Have we not suffered enough for the past 45 years that we now have to be used as pawns for your fantasies about war with Israel? Leave us alone. We don’t want that.”  “So if you want to support the Islamic Republic in putting Iranians’ lives at risk, and everyone’s lives at risk, they just killed a 10-year old-Bedouin boy for this, is that what you wanted? Then just come out and say that with your whole chest. Say you support the Islamic Republic in their continued aggressions that put everybody’s lives at risk But don’t say Iran. For two years we asked you to come out and say free Iran and now you want to speak up to put our lives at risk and say go to war, Iran. You are no friend to the Iranian people for that,” she concluded."
Elica Le Bon الیکا‌ ل بن on X - "Message to the world, if they’ll hear us now."

lelemSLP on X - "I've never seen anything more embarrassing than this.  When it was about Hamas - many people in the world don't know that "Gaza occupation" agenda is a total lie.   But now, these STFU (Students of TikTok Facts University) supporting Islamic Republic of Iran...  When only few years ago, the fight for freedom of Iranian people against Islamists Regime was trending on TikTok!  "Resistance is justified when people are occupied" - and that's why these TikTok experts are supporting the Occupier of Iranian people - Islamic Republic of Iran???  The Islamists government of Iran (the ones who hang people on cranes, who execute women for not wearing hijab) is the poor victim resisting the oppression and occupation? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂  I guess Western adults who were confused by Hamas propaganda and supported these idiotic agendas, now don't know where to hide from embarrassment...  #IRGCterrorists"

leekern on X - "The world always puts pressure on Israel to do nothing because they know Israel and the Jews are the sane rational ones they can actually talk to  They know Islamic fundamentalists are fucking whack jobs who jump up and down shouting Allahu Akbar like a jukebox for twats  They know they are dick heads with the minds of tantrum throwing children   But just because Israel is an adult country and the regime in Iran is unhinged, doesn’t mean you let their transgressive behaviour go unchecked  The more you give in to the huffs and puffs and tantrums and unacceptable actions of Islamic fundamentalists - the worse their behaviour will become  They must be stood up to and put in their place when they act out of line"

Israeli retaliation against Iran was necessary - "Following Israel’s April 18 limited strike on Isfahan, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak asked that “calm heads” prevail and that all parties avoid “significant escalation.” Israel’s action is in fact the best way to avoid further escalation and restore the deterrence of Iranian attacks on Israel that prevents it.  The war in Gaza is as much about Iran’s regional ambitions as about the plight of the Palestinians... It was inevitable that Iran and its Palestinian proxy Hamas would try to provoke an Arab-Israeli clash to fracture the incipient coalition. The October 7 attacks, which would not have occurred without Iranian approval, were the result... Mishandling of Israeli-U.S. relations on both sides had strengthened the temptation for Iran to escalate. Prime Minister Netanyahu had unwisely drawn attention to disagreements with Washington which more deft diplomacy would have minimized, not least by cancelling and then restoring a planned visit by Israeli officials to Washington. President Biden’s repeated calls for Israeli “restraint” in Gaza, unwisely made in public, reinforced the impression of daylight between Israel and the U.S.   That Israel foolishly struck Damascus without informing the U.S., despite the danger of subsequent retaliation against U.S. forces, and that the U.S. made this public, further magnified the apparent gap.    Finally, Biden’s warnings to Tehran not to attack Israel pledged help in Israel’s defence but stopped short of threatening American cooperation in any retaliatory action. Tehran could now risk an attack on Israel without fear of U.S. reprisals.  Of course, Iran took steps to reduce the consequences of its attack. It was telegraphed in advance, enabling Israeli air defences, with assistance from traditional allies and discreet cooperation with Arab states, to down almost all Iranian drones and missiles with minimal damage to Israel... There were grounds for seeing the Iranian attack as “symbolic” or “performative.” And Iran has engaged in “symbolic” retaliation before, responding to the 2020 U.S. assassination of an Iranian general with a retaliatory strike on U.S. forces that killed nobody. Many military actions are symbolic in the sense that they convey a political message to the enemy or to third parties. But part of the symbolism of Iran’s attack is that it set a precedent of direct attack on Israeli soil.   Iran could have attacked from Lebanon with Hezbollah’s rockets, with shorter flight times, and against which air defences would have been less effective. But that would not have made the essential political point.  So far, Iran has enjoyed immunity from direct Israeli retaliation as long as it refrained from direct attack itself. Extending that immunity from retaliation to direct attack below a certain threshold, would in itself be a substantial escalation. Tehran’s public statements after the attack that it saw the matter as “concluded” were also intended to discourage Israeli retaliation and generate international opposition to it.    Unwisely public, pressure on Israel from its allies and others to do nothing could only encourage Tehran to think that calibrated attacks could continue, with international pressure preventing Israeli reprisals. Successful pressure along these lines would not be unprecedented. During the Gulf War, President George H.W. Bush persuaded Israel not to retaliate against Iraqi Scud attacks lest this fracture the coalition for repelling Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait.   But it is unclear whether Iran would necessarily calculate correctly. The success of air defences on April 13 was unprecedented, and even a marginal reduction in their effectiveness would have entailed substantial loss of Israeli lives. Accepting the possibility of a repetition that might be more destructive was inevitably unacceptable to Israel.  So, Israeli retaliation was not just permissible but necessary... Israel’s restoration of deterrence against direct Iranian attack actually limits the current conflict. Iran’s pursuit of regional hegemony and its proximity to a useable nuclear capability means that a military reckoning with Tehran may be inevitable."

Iran's intentions have been known for decades. Why hasn't anyone listened? - "despite the fact Iran has repeatedly issued threats of wiping Israel off the map, many analysts, scholars, and politicians seem taken aback by Iran’s brazen attack. This feigned surprise isn’t fooling anyone. The West’s willfully blind approach to Iran not only enabled this assault on Israel, it also led to the barbaric terrorist attacks in Israel on October 7. If these atrocities and belligerent acts of aggression aren’t enough to wake us up to the dangers of Iran then what will? For over forty years, Iran has spent every ounce of its social, political, economic, and military capital on exporting its radical ideology, harvesting terrorism, and obtaining the nuclear bomb—all with two primary objectives in mind: eroding American influence and destroying Israel.  Since at least the 1960s, when Iran’s first Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini began nudging his country towards an obsession with antisemitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American thinking, Iran’s ruling elite has sought to mobilize regional support around the idea of Tehran as a transformative force committed to Muslim liberation across the globe... without Iranian weapons, financial support, training, and aggressive propaganda campaigns, everything from the Second Lebanon War to October 7 would have never happened.  Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, Western nations have, by and large, turned a blind eye to Iran’s deadly fundamentalist ideology and the regime’s appalling activities—activities that have led to the loss of untold thousands of lives throughout the Middle East and beyond.    This is not to suggest our collective approach to Iran—or lack thereof—is motivated by nefarious intentions. Rather, it is likely due to a combination of factors, including existing beliefs that Israel is more powerful than it really is, a deep-seated view, conscious or unconscious, that Jerusalem is to blame for regional hostilities, and an issue that has plagued Western decisionmakers for ages: ignoring or belittling what our enemies tell us.   From Adolf Hitler’s antisemitic diatribes which he issued for years before the Holocaust, to Osama bin Laden’s jihadi declaration against America half a decade before 9/11, to Putin’s rhetoric on Ukraine, our adversaries tell us time and time again what they plan to do—and then they do it. Nearly twenty years ago, former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said “The occupying regime of Jerusalem must be disappeared from the page of time.” Yet, in the time since, virtually no attempts have been made to curb Iranian aggression towards Israel. Ultimately, it would appear that most in the West either aren’t listening to Iran or they aren’t taking Tehran’s words seriously. In the same way, we would never suggest Russia is Ukraine’s problem to address alone, we cannot expect Israel to confront and contain Iranian acts of war in isolation"

Meme - Marina Medvin @MarinaMedvin: "Incredible. She wrote this up so that it appears that Israel is responsible for the injuries to the 7 year old child, as opposed to Iran. Absolutely incredible."
Rep. Ilhan Omar @Ilhan: "Rep. Omar's Statement on Iran's Attack on Israel:
WASHINGTON-Congresswoman Ihan Omar (D-MN) released the following statement following Iran's attack on Israel. "I condemn the attacks by the Iranian military on Israel, as well as Israel's military attack on the Iranian consulate in Syria that further escalates tension in the region. I am grateful no deaths were reported from the attack and am praying for Amina al-Hassouni, the 7-year-old Bedouin civilian who was severely injured in the attack, to make a complete recovery. As leaders in Washington jump to call for war with Iran and rush additional offensive weapons to the Israeli military, we need to exercise restraint and use every diplomatic tool to de-escalate tensions, Civilians in not only Gaza, Israel, the West Bank, and Iran but also Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen are bearing the brunt of this escalation, and there must be a ceasefire on all sides. I will continue to calll for de-escalation, restraint, and lasting peace."

Meme - i/o wire service @iowireservice: "Retard Index Rating: 7 (out of 10).  The US does not operate bases in Pakistan, Afghanistan or Turkmenistan. Also, it no longer operates bases at some of the other points indicated on the map.  This popular meme is a magnet for retards."
Jake Shields @jakeshieldsajj: "why do we have 30 military bases surrounding Iran? Iran isn't a threat to America but America is a threat to Iran"
"IRAN WANTS WAR. LOOK HOW CLOSE THEY PUT THEIR COUNTRY TO OUR MILITARY BASES"

Meme - Elder of Ziyon: "Don't squander all of this goodwill!" 
"See? The vest stopped most of the bullets from the crazed psychopath who promises to keep trying to murder you. Don't respond! Take the win!"

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Links - 23rd April 2024 (3 - Degrowth)

OPINION: Economic growth is good for your health - "there is a strong positive correlation between the wealth of nations and the life expectancy of their populations... In addition to the statistical observation that citizens of richer countries generally live longer, the data also supports the fact that the more a given economy grows, the more likely its citizens’ life expectancy will rise. A good way of illustrating this is to observe the trajectories of the two Koreas following their separation in 1945. In 1950, the first post-partition year for which life expectancy data exist, North Koreans could expect to live to be 49.22 years old, while South Koreans could expect to live 46.62 years. At the time, North Korea, having a more industrial economy, was richer than South Korea, which remained a largely agricultural economy. Although the North Korean regime is renowned for its lack of transparency, it is estimated that before the 1960s, its GDP per capita was anywhere from 30% to 50% higher than South Korea’s. Today, South Koreans can expect to live to be 82.77 years old, whereas the life expectancy of North Koreans is 71.96 years... One study of the matter found that between 1986 and 2000, 40% of the life expectancy gains in the 52 countries examined were directly related to the development and marketing of new drugs. Other studies looking specifically at the wealthiest countries find that the development of new drugs is responsible for a non-negligible portion of the reduction in mortality risks after the age of 65. The resources needed to discover and develop new drugs, to test them and bring them to market, are very substantial. It is no surprise, then, that the most prosperous societies in the world are the ones that really have the means to do so, and therefore are the ones that spend the most money on pharmaceutical research and development."
Of course, the de-growth crowd will just blame capitalism

How stalling growth hurts the planet - "Degrowthism may seem like the only reasonable response to the climate challenges we face, but the experience of enforced economic shrinking during the pandemic indicates the pain would outweigh the benefits — especially for the world's poorest... The very real human pain of 2020 — and the political fallout it created — should be taken as a warning sign to degrowthers.
A new Pew Research Center analysis found the ranks of the global middle income — those who live on $10.01 to $20 a day — fell by 54 million in 2020 compared to the number projected before the pandemic, while the number of global poor rose by 131 million.     And while carbon emissions did fall significantly in 2020, it came at a high cost. One analysis estimated that each ton of CO2 reduced due to pandemic-related degrowth will have an implied cost to the economy of more than $1,500.     That's "an order of magnitude greater than the most costly of 'technofixes'" like direct capture of carbon from the air, as Ted Nordhaus of the Breakthrough Institute wrote last year...
The strongest argument around degrowth is one rooted in a goal that its own advocates strive for: global equity... we tend to focus on the huge and growing wealth gap between the ultrarich and the middle class and poor in rich countries like the U.S. But a much bigger gap exists between even the relatively less well-off in the developed world and most of humanity...  For all the environmental pressure growth has created, in recent decades, both rich and poor countries have been able to continue to grow while reducing many pollutants through more efficiency and cleaner energy."
Of course, the left wing "solution" is to destroy capitalism. Then everyone will be equally miserable

Economic growth is an unnecessary evil, Jacinda Ardern is right to deprioritise it (2019)
New Zealand slips into its second recession in 18 months (2024) - "New Zealand has entered its second recession in 18 months after the latest round of GDP figures confirmed its economy contracted in the last quarter of 2023."

Why Degrowth Is the Worst Idea on the Planet | WIRED - "For half a century, we've been told that we had to embrace degrowth in order to save our planet. We haven't listened. Around the world, human populations and economies have continued to grow at rates that are virtually unprecedented in the history of our species.  Over that same span, an unexpected and encouraging pattern has emerged: The world's richest countries have learned how to reduce their footprint on Earth. They're polluting less, using less land and water, consuming smaller amounts of important natural resources, and doing better in many other ways. Some of these trends are also now visible in less affluent countries. However, many in the degrowth movement seem to have trouble taking yes for an answer. The claims I just made are widely resisted or ignored. Some say they’ve been debunked... Some voices in the conversation about the environment seem wedded to the idea that degrowth is necessary, and they are unwilling or unable to walk away from it, no matter the evidence... The evidence is overwhelming that rich countries cleaned up their air pollution much more than they outsourced it. For one, a great deal of air pollution comes from highway vehicles and power plants, and rich countries haven’t outsourced driving and generating electricity to low-income ones. In fact, high-income countries haven't even offshored most of their industry. The US and UK both manufacture more than they did 50 years ago (at least until the Covid-19 pandemic sharply reduced output), and Germany has been a net exporter since 2000 while continuing to drive down air pollution. The rest of the world has been exporting its manufacturing pollution to Germany (to use degrowthers’ phrasing), yet Germans are breathing cleaner air than they were 20 years ago. Rich countries have reduced their air pollution not by embracing degrowth or offshoring, but instead by enacting and enforcing smart regulation. As economists Joseph Shapiro and Reed Walker concluded in a 2018 study about the US, “changes in environmental regulation, rather than changes in productivity and trade, account for most of the emissions reductions.” Research about the cleanup of US waters also concludes that well-designed and enforced regulations have successfully reduced pollution. It is true that the US and other rich countries now import lots of products from China and other nations with higher pollution levels. But if there were no international trade at all, and rich countries had to rely exclusively on their domestic industries to make everything they consume, they’d still have much cleaner air and water than they did 50 years ago. As a 2004 Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy study summarized: “We find no evidence that domestic production of pollution-intensive goods in the US is being replaced by imports from overseas.” The rich world’s success at decoupling growth from pollution is an inconvenient fact for degrowthers. Even more inconvenient is China's recent success at doing the same... China's progress with air pollution is heartening, but it's not surprising to most economists. It's a clear example of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in action... It's not surprising that today's degrowth advocates rarely discuss the large reductions in air and water pollution that have accompanied higher prosperity in so many places around the world. Instead, degrowthers now focus heavily on one kind of pollution: greenhouse gas emissions. The claims made are familiar ones: that any apparent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in rich countries are due to offshoring rather than actual decarbonization. Thanks to the Global Carbon Project, we can see if this is the case. GCP has calculated “consumption-based emissions” for many countries going back to 1990, taking into account imports and exports, yielding the greenhouse gas emissions embodied in all the goods and services consumed in each country each year. For several of the world's richest countries, including Germany, Italy, France, the UK, and the US, graphs of consumption-based carbon emissions follow the familiar EKC. The US, for example, has reduced its total (not per capita) consumption-based CO2 emissions by more than 13 percent since 2007. These reductions are not mainly due to enhanced regulation. Instead, they've come about because of a combination of tech progress and market forces. Solar and wind power have become much cheaper in recent years and have displaced coal for electricity generation. Natural gas, which when burned emits fewer greenhouse gases per unit of energy than does coal (even after taking methane leakage into account), has also become much cheaper and more abundant in the US as a result of the fracking revolution.  To ensure that these greenhouse gas declines continue to spread and accelerate, we should apply the lessons we've learned from previous pollution reduction success... Tech progress and price pressure aren't just leading to the demise of coal. They're also causing us to exploit the planet less in many other important ways, even as growth continues. In other words, EKCs are not just about pollution any more.  A good place to start examining this broad phenomenon of getting more from less is US agriculture, where we have decades of data on both outputs—crop tonnage—and the key inputs of cropland, water, and fertilizer... Forest products provide another clear example of dematerialization in the US. Total annual domestic consumption of paper and paperboard peaked in 1999, and of timber in 2002. Both totals have since declined by more than 20 percent... For reasons that I don't understand well, and that I understand less the more evidence I look at, degrowthers want to make us turn around and start walking back down the path, away from higher prosperity. Their vision seems to be one of a centrally planned, ever-deepening recession throughout the rich world for the sake of the environment. Thanks to Covid-19, we have an inkling of how this would feel... ob losses, business closures, mortgage defaults, and other hardships and uncertainties. And it would have them without end—after all, growth can't be allowed to restart. Corporate and government revenue would decrease permanently, and therefore so would innovation and R&D.  How many of us would be willing to accept all of this in exchange for somewhat less pollution and resource use? To sharpen the question, how many of us would be willing to accept this recession if it wasn’t necessary—if it were clear that we could get environmental improvements while continuing to grow and prosper?"
When you hate capitalism more than you love the planet

After the Pandemic: Hope and… | The Breakthrough Institute - "In contrast to the techno-optimism of ecomodernists and even many more traditional environmentalists, a very vocal and online minority has long insisted that the only way to tackle climate change and other major environmental challenges is to not only slow economic growth but end it, cutting global consumption deeply in order to avoid ecological catastrophe. Degrowth has no constituency to speak of in the real world and most of its proponents, being modern, western, educated elites, continue to consume at levels completely incompatible with the levels of consumption they advocate. But the notion has an outsized footprint in academia, in scholarly publications, and in the environmental media.  2020 was, it turns out, probably the biggest experiment in degrowth ever attempted... while many of us came to better appreciate these simpler joys, few of us appear to have much desire to limit our futures in these ways. Around the world, citizens only acquiesced to the COVID shutdowns thanks to extremely generous relief packages, including cash payments, bonus unemployment insurance, and support for restaurants and other businesses whose commerce has been interrupted by the pandemic. These benefits provided the average American household with over $5000 of extra income this year. And even with unprecedented trillions spent on these relief programs, we think it is fair to say that neither mandated nor voluntary restrictions on travel and consumption have proven particularly sustainable... And all that for, in the end, not a particularly large environmental benefit, achieved at enormous cost... As BTI’s Zeke Hausfather calculated this past spring, the implied cost per ton of carbon reduced due to degrowth associated with the COVID pandemic will exceed $1500 per ton of CO2, an order of magnitude greater than the most costly of “technofixes.”   The simpler life and end of hyper-consumerism that degrowthers imagine may be desirable for them. But it does not appear so for the billions in the global middle class who appear by all accounts extremely eager to return to restaurants, airports, and hotels. And it is certainly not an option for the billions more of our global neighbors who depend on subsistence agriculture for meager wages amid insufficient infrastructure and opportunity.  If 2020 has established anything, it is that the only way to mitigate the negative environmental externalities produced by global economic growth is through it. A richer world is both more resilient to the impacts of climate change and better able to invest in the advanced technologies and modern infrastructures necessary to mitigate it."

Roo Barker | Facebook - "On some level the iPhones new Clean Energy Charging feature is a good thing, not because it will make a difference for the environment, it won't, but because for the first time it partially exposes some pro-degrowther teens to the less convenient life they advocate for"

Degrowth in the Age of Dickens - "John Stuart Mill... argued that the need for economic growth in the richest countries had run its course. “It is only in the backward countries of the world that increased production is still an important object,” he concluded. His was far from the last suggestion that more output from greater industrialization would do little to improve quality of life. But perhaps the very antiquity of the idea should stand as a warning to those of principle and liberality who have come to a similar conclusion since then. Would modern proponents of degrowth agree that the United Kingdom’s productivity could be dialed back 170 years with minimal costs to the country’s quality of life?... Dark, satanic mills loomed over fetid and diseased slums housing the miserable inspiration for Dickens’s novels of proletarian despair and Marx’s prophecy of inevitable revolution... for all of Mill’s fears regarding “every flowery waste or natural pasture ploughed up,” the amount of land used for farming has declined since the 19th century... For all its recent rise, inequality in the UK is still considerably lower than it was a century and a half ago, so that greater income has been more equitably distributed. It is worth comparing Mill’s view of sufficient output to guarantee a good life to developing-country incomes today. He suggested that, fairly distributed, the UK’s productivity in 1850 would have been sufficient for its population. That productivity generated a per capita income of $2,858 (measured in purchasing power parity in 2011 dollars). In 2016, Bangladesh had an income of $3,250. That Asian developing country performs considerably better than late 19th century Britain on measures of quality of life, including education and health — for example, it sees a life expectancy of 72 years. But still, it would be a fairly radical position today to argue that all Bangladesh needs to achieve a comfortably high standard of living is greater equality and that it should adopt a zero-growth target. A perfectly distributed income would leave each person in Bangladesh living on about $4 a day, according to the World Bank’s PovcalNet tool. That compares with a poverty line in modern Britain of about $25/day... Mill was hardly the first (and far from the last) to suggest that well-being required equality far more than greater productivity, or indeed that greater productivity overall was a positive evil. Rousseau’s writings had pointed strongly in the same direction a century before. Mill’s contemporary, Karl Marx, imagined life after the revolution, where work was carried out for joy rather than the necessity of consumption: “fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticize after dinner, just as I have a mind.” And Marx predicted that revolution was imminent in European countries undergoing industrialization, suggesting that he, too, saw little need for far higher productivity to bring on a utopia for workers. Across the Atlantic, Henry David Thoreau spent two years living his dream of a simpler life in a cabin by Walden Pond in Concord, Massachusetts just as Mill was drafting his Principles.  John Maynard Keynes, writing 80 years after Mill on the subject of Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren, suggested that, as long as population was controlled, “there will be ever larger and larger classes and groups of people from whom problems of economic necessity have been practically removed.” Indeed, his worry was that there would be too little to do... In that fear, he was joined by a succession of economists... In the UK, E.J. Mishan spent the 1960s warning that economic growth produced nothing but discontent. (In 1960, the UK’s income per capita was about the same as Egypt’s today.) Across the Atlantic, J. K. Galbraith’s Affluent Society, published in 1958, suggested that demand for necessities was already well met for most Americans and, with redistribution, could easily be met for all. (He wrote this at a time when one third of the country still went to the toilet in an outhouse and washing machines were a rarity.)... Both those who saw doom from greater production and those who saw present consumption as increasingly frivolous perhaps lacked imagination. It is far easier to imagine the environmental crises that will emerge if we continue on our current path than the solutions that might allow for both continued prosperity and sustainability. After all, some of those solutions have not been invented, and more have not been implemented.  Similarly, prophets of the robot-led jobs apocalypse miss the fact that new technologies create whole new products and services, which in turn create new types of employment. These are hard to predict precisely because they haven’t been invented yet. We have well-paid app designers and cybersecurity experts whose job descriptions would have been meaningless to Keynes. There is an entire cable channel, DOGTV, with producers, show-runners, vets, and many others involved in creating content for dogs (and humans) to enjoy. Neither Mill nor Marx could have imagined such employment... the coronavirus crisis has amply demonstrated that collapsing the economy is woefully insufficient to meet environmental targets, including lower greenhouse gas emissions, even as it has crashed incomes and significantly increased self-reported misery. Economic growth may not reliably and sustainably increase subjective well-being, but apparently, contraction can achieve the reverse... “Why was Mill wrong then, but I am right now?”"

Mythinformed on X: "Listen to what “DeGrowth” activists say is necessary their own words - "“A 95% energy reduction in the United States” “The construction of an eco-socialist state” “A worker led revolution”"
When you want to destroy the economy, tank living standards and introduce communism

Opinion: Canada is no longer one of the richest nations on Earth. Country after country is passing us by - The Globe and Mail - "If you took a poll, I suspect you would find most Canadians still think of us as one of the richest countries on Earth: maybe fifth or sixth. And at one time we were. As late as 1981, Canada ranked sixth among OECD countries in GDP per capita, behind only Switzerland, Luxembourg, Norway, the United States and Denmark.  But we’re not any more. As of 2022 we were 15th. Over the 40-odd years in between, Canada’s per capita GDP grew more slowly than that of 22 other OECD members. Countries that used to be poorer than us – Ireland, the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden, Iceland, Australia, Germany, Belgium, Finland – are now richer than we are... Even this somewhat overstates our position. Canadians work more hours, on average, than people in other countries. Measured in output per hour worked – which is what we mean by labour productivity – we ranked 18th in 2022, having posted the slowest rate of productivity growth in the OECD since 1981, but for Switzerland. Given our performance in 2023, I don’t think we should be surprised to find we have since dropped out of the top 20.  Again, the contrast with the United States is striking: Up to about 2000, labour productivity in the two countries grew at roughly comparable rates. Since then, U.S. productivity has grown nearly three times as fast. It is a dismal prospect. When an economy ceases to grow, it isn’t only living standards that suffer. It’s everything they represent. A society that cannot look forward to a future of rising living standards is one that is deprived of one of the primary motive forces of human behaviour – hope. Without the universal lubricant of growth, all of the divisions within a society – between the classes, between the generations, between sexes and races and (this is Canada, after all) regions – are likely to be more inflamed... What makes this especially galling is that it is almost never talked about in our politics. Party leaders hammer away at each other over growth in the short term, though they can do very little to alter it. But long-term growth barely rates a mention.  Yet this is the sort of growth that governments can do something about. For all the fruitless debates about macroeconomic stabilization policy, and which form of stimulus, fiscal or monetary, is least ineffective at raising growth in the short term, the long-term growth trajectory of an economy really is responsive to policy... Since around 2000, while business investment in residential structures has roughly doubled as a percentage of GDP, investment in machinery and equipment has roughly halved. Could this go some way to explain why our relative productivity growth fell off so sharply after then? Have we been so busy capitalizing on rising housing prices that we neglected to invest in the sorts of things that make it possible to afford a house?"
The degrowth people should be happy. But the left is complaining that capitalism has failed because incomes aren't growing

Mythinformed on X - "Listen to what “DeGrowth” activists say is necessary their own words: “A 95% energy reduction in the United States” “The construction of an eco-socialist state” “A worker led revolution”"
Meme - "There are no low energy, rich countries *GDP per capita vs Electricity consumption per capita*"

Serfing the planet - "Many of those in Glasgow at the moment pray at the altar of ‘de-growth’. They want to limit the consumption of the working and middle classes, undermine their jobs, raise their energy bills, and inhibit their ability to buy property or travel... With climate, as with many other issues, the upper classes are inflicting their own preferences on working- and middle-class people. As nonprofits, oligarchs and bureaucrats plot out the future, small business owners and the middle class, as one entrepreneur put it, are ‘not at the table – or even in the room’... The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development has noted that, across the 36 wealthier countries, the uber-wealthy have taken an ever greater share of national GDP in recent decades, while the middle class ‘looks increasingly like a boat in rocky waters’... Experts are warning that one third of small businesses could shut down for good. Hundreds of thousands have already disappeared, including nearly half of all black-owned businesses. Overall, according to a report from May this year, roughly 37 per cent of all US small business owners can’t pay their rent... Already climate-oriented policies have underpinned efforts to block affordable homes being built on the periphery and force ever more density on urban areas...   In the UK, the government’s Climate Change Committee is putting forward proposals that would make it impossible to sell single-family homes – including those built mere decades ago – that do not meet stringent energy standards... Analysts predict that soon most middle-class people will be ‘priced out’ of ownership in a ‘rentership society’, where homes, furniture and other necessities are turned into rental products offering endless cashflow to the oligarchs.  All this fits what the Davos crowd calls the ‘great reset’, a top-down effort at refashioning capitalism and daily life along green lines. The goal is not just to turn potential owners into tenants but also to reduce all consumption in general, as part of a move to a ‘net zero’ future where cars will become rarer, miles will be taxed and only expensive electric cars will remain, largely only for the rich.  The anti-middle class jihad also threatens the livelihoods of millions of working-class people, particularly those in well-paying manufacturing, construction and energy jobs. Green policies have already accelerated the de-industrialisation of countries such as the United Kingdom, and could undermine recent efforts to bring factories back from China. Those much heralded ‘green jobs’, so central to the climatista pitch, turn out to pay far less and are far less likely to be unionised. Many of them may end up in developing countries anyway."

The dangerous myth of degrowth | The Spectator - "Take a comment piece published late last year in the normally sober pages of the scientific journal Nature. Under the title ‘Degrowth Can Work’, it declared that: ‘Wealthy economies should abandon growth of gross domestic product (GDP) as a goal, scale down destructive and unnecessary forms of production to reduce energy and material use, and focus economic activity around securing human needs and wellbeing.’  The lead author was Jason Hickel, a visiting fellow at the LSE who on Newsnight in 2017 came up with the unusual theory that there are too many jobs in Britain. Humans, he said, are ‘overshooting our planet’s bio-capacity by 60 per cent’, and the only way to save ourselves is by ‘introducing a basic income and a shorter working week which would allow us to get rid of unnecessary jobs and redistribute labour’. Never mind the pain that follows every time GDP growth dips into the red. Never mind the despair created by falling real incomes. If we all worked less we would be far happier. Who gets to decide what is an ‘unnecessary job’, Hickel didn’t say. Many, I suspect, might well choose to nominate the LSE’s visiting professorship in International Inequalities as one of the jobs to go.   Another of the Nature authors is Tim Jackson, who runs a green thinktank called the Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity. Jackson has written a book called Prosperity Without Growth, and accused Rishi Sunak of pursuing a ‘fetish’ of growth. It is clear, he says, that ‘we’re already living in a post-growth world. And it’s time to take that challenge seriously. To focus on protecting wellbeing. To distribute wealth fairly. To invest in the care economy. To improve education’. That tax revenues from healthy businesses might be useful in improving education and the care system does not appear to enter his thinking.  Then there is Bill McGuire, a volcanologist who’s now emeritus professor of geophysical and climate hazards at UCL. He has called for ‘the contraction of the global economy until it reaches a sustainable steady-state that fits with a level of greenhouse gas emissions compatible with keeping rising temperatures this side of the 1.5 degrees guardrail’. For McGuire, the government’s ambition for ‘green growth’ doesn’t cut it – no, to save the world we have to shrink the economy: less wealth, less stuff. Especially less stuff. In June, McGuire tweeted a photo of a container ship arriving at Felixstowe with what he said was 24,000 containers. His caption read: ‘More than anything, this image encapsulates everything that is wrong with our society.’ But how did he know what was inside all those containers? Was it all frivolous stuff like toys for Christmas crackers or might there have been, say, some PPE bound for NHS hospitals? Unless McGuire wears only locally sourced knitted underwear, my guess would be that something on that ship, or another like it, is found in his home.  It would be easy to dismiss the ramblings of Marxist academics. After all, the idea of ‘degrowth’ has been around since the 1970s without obviously harming anyone. The term, it seems, was coined by the Austrian-French economist André Gorz in 1972, the era of E.F. Schumacher’s book Small Is Beautiful. Hickel has written the similarly themed Less Is More. Yet the idea that economic growth is an evil seems to have become a lot more mainstream of late – fed, inevitably, by climate hysteria... Turning off their domestic appliances became raised to a matter of religious observance. A woman from Inverness told the Guardian how she and her partner brought dinnertime forward to 4.30 and then sat with candles and wood-burning stove. They had even turned off the electric foot-raiser on their sofa. ‘If this can help prevent the National Grid using coal-fired power then we’ll feel like it was really worth it. Part of this for me is learning how to deprive myself of something,’ she said.  There’s the point: it is one thing to advocate the end of economic growth if you have no actual fear of poverty. If you are struggling to keep yourself warm and fed, on the other hand, the idea of self-denial – still less of shrinking the economy – is going to have rather less appeal. Degrowth is a middle–class luxury, an indulgence to be conducted from the comfort of your sofa with its electronic foot-raiser. It revolves around matters of taste as much as the environment. People who express disgust with consumerism have a tendency to disapprove of other people’s while overlooking their own. Those who boast of buying less stuff are often not averse to the odd skiing holiday – as the holiday snaps of Extinction Rebellion activists have attested.   Bizarrely, the idea of degrowth trips off the tongue of some of the very same people who on another day will complain the loudest when incomes fall. Former Green party leader Caroline Lucas denounced Jeremy Hunt’s Autumn Statement as ‘ideologically driven Tory austerity’. The problem, evidently, is Tory austerity rather than the much better-flavoured Green party austerity, because Lucas doesn’t seem to be a great believer in people becoming better off. In 2021 she complained that ‘The endless pursuit of economic growth, as the lodestar of government policy, is what is driving the climate crisis’. If a shrinking economy does not amount to austerity, I don’t know what does.   If you are a nurse, ambulance driver, driving examiner or a member of the many other groups who have been striking about the failure of your wages to keep pace with inflation, your enemy is not Hunt; it is the degrowthers... the traditional left, which seeks a fairer slice of the national cake for working people, has yet to collide head-on with those who want to reduce the size of the cake altogether...   Liz Truss was ridiculed for talking about the ‘anti-growth coalition’. She certainly went over the top, making it out to include people who do favour economic growth, such as some of her former cabinet colleagues. Yet there really is an anti-growth tendency, whose ideas are filtering down into terribly well-meaning middle-class people. Anyone who thinks the Tories have been inflicting ‘austerity’ on the country for the past 13 years should be looking over their shoulder for the people who genuinely want to shrink the economy."
Of course, the left wing "solution" is redistribution. They don't consider themselves rich - but everyone richer than them is rich. Too bad if you look at a global scale, they are super rich and will have to be impoverished

‘Degrowth’ — Marxism is back for the modern age - "Foremost in Japan’s recent mainstreaming of Marx has been Kohei Saito, a thoroughly engaging philosopher who, from a book-lined study at the University of Tokyo, argues that degrowth is the only way to save society from a crisis of inequality and impending environmental doom. Growth did not make us happy. Frustration is rife. Reusable coffee flasks will not save us, he contends, sipping from one. Whether the Japanese public actually agrees with the thesis or not — and there is no reason to equate vast readership with widespread conviction — a great many are certainly curious about Saito’s framing of the issue. And that itself is intriguing in light of one of Japan’s less discussed generational divisions: the split between anyone older than about 50 and those under 35 — the latter being, arguably, the rich world’s first degrowthed cohort... Meat, SUVs and sports cars should be far more heavily taxed to offset the damage they do, he says. He also believes that, because it works so well at promoting endless unnecessary consumption, advertising should be heavily restricted — in particular the kind of giant LCD screens that loom over Tokyo, draining power Japan can ill-afford to waste. “We could eliminate advertising from society and nobody would suffer at all except the advertising industry,” he says."

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Latest posts (which you might not see on this page)

powered by Blogger | WordPress by Newwpthemes